Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: September 16th, 2013, 5:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
erik_t wrote:
It's a well-executed drawing, but I can't claim that the design makes any sense whatsoever.
mjau!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 8th, 2013, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Let's put it this way, it's a very good looking cruiser design but the problem is Mk. 42 and Mk. 10 are already obsolete by late 1970s (I can understand why Mk. 10 is there though) Perhaps go for the 8 in Mk. 71? Also, why would they build such a large cruiser at that time without SPY-1?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 9th, 2013, 11:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
I'm starting from almost scratch.


The main objective is an AAW Escort (super) cruiser with speed capability to follow any vessel it's have to escort, She should be an vessel that can take care of here self if she need to be traveling alone. It would of course have capacity in ASW and ASuW

I put it up now because:

- Where can I reduce where can I increase?
- How should the armament be placed for best use.
- shall I move the aft VLS to between both reactors, and move the aft reactor, hangar and helodeck more aft and create and large helo deck.
- Other ideas... she feel a bit tall for me
- replace the forward 76mm with CIWS


[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 1:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
The basic silhuette looks familiar, but I can`t quite name the ship.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 1:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
  • The 76mm mount was a one-off in the USN. It was used on only two classes of ship, and replaced a 35mm twin on one of them. I strongly doubt that you'd see something like it on a ship this size.
  • Every USN design that could went for the faces angled to the fore-aft-port-starboard SPY-1 configuration you have here. The Ticonderoga configuration was driven by the use of the existing structure on the Spruances.
  • To that end, I suggest looking at CGBL as a base for the layout, not the Ticonderoga.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 1:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Heuhen, your Sea Dragon/Sea Staillon top view got flipped.
http://img.wp.scn.ru/camms/ar/820/pics/3_9.jpg
Karle94 wrote:
The basic silhuette looks familiar, but I can`t quite name the ship.
Seems like a cross between a Ticonderoga and Erik_t missile battleship/cruiser.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 2:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
BB1987 wrote:
Heuhen, your Sea Dragon/Sea Staillon top view got flipped.
http://img.wp.scn.ru/camms/ar/820/pics/3_9.jpg

Then my part-sheet must have flipped it at some point!
Karle94 wrote:
The basic silhuette looks familiar, but I can`t quite name the ship.
Seems like a cross between a Ticonderoga and Erik_t missile battleship/cruiser.
I did go for Tico... due to easy some of the work. but as TimothyC suggest I should go for the CGBL look.

For the Erik_t Battleship feel... well I was inspired by him. first I though that such ship need an escort but then I realized why not try to make an more compact version of that on exsisting technology, as perhaps an follow up design. or just an stand alone design...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 3:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Whit the drawing bellow as the base line, but just much bigger.

[ img ]


- My CGN going to have two Mk-41 VLS on the for-deck.
- SPY-1 etc.

but my mine question is that shall I go for and large hello deck that I have gone on the previuse WIP or shall I have just an standard size hello deck with medium helicopter, and have an Mk-41 VLS on the aft deck, perhaps two VLS aft. (one full size one small)?
Shall I have an superstructure between the two superstructure or shall I just drop it. It will be an open area due to those two reactors.


edit: BTW I have just did an copy and past from the CGBL to my drawing... look up to see the update in my previous post!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 3:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: US Cruiser CGNPosted: October 10th, 2013, 7:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
are the someone that have an nice looking RHIB. I am going for 4 RHIB on this CGN.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 35 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]