Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 54 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Go to page « 152 53 54 55 56123 »
Author Message
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 8:20 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
I might just have to draw a carrier to put them on. 8-)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 8:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Bombhead wrote:
I might just have to draw a carrier to put them on. 8-)
:shock:

A carrier just for my babies...

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 10:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
I can't stand the look of the new QE so I was thinking of something like this.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 10:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Oh yes, the P.1216 needs a carrier! :D Why on earth the British axed what is quite possibly the sexiest plane of the modern era, no one will ever possibly fathom. :(

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Andorianus
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 10:38 pm
Offline
Posts: 160
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:19 pm
Location: Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
I remember that Queen Liz. It was in Kijk magazine around 8 years ago, and I was pretty impressed by it back then. Not saying much because I barely had any knowledge about carriers back then...

AU carrier for P.1216 would be even more awesome. Glorious Queen Liz\CVA-01 crossover ftw. :D

_________________
You can call me Andy.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 10:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
wait what? 8 years ago?..... must be more, I have never seen it and I have every single Kijk there is since november 2003 :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 18th, 2012, 10:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Allways a big fan of this one myself:

[ img ]
[ img ]

Very slender island. There's a version with a ramp out there somewhere, but I can't find it.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Andorianus
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 19th, 2012, 3:35 pm
Offline
Posts: 160
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:19 pm
Location: Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
acelanceloet wrote:
wait what? 8 years ago?..... must be more, I have never seen it and I have every single Kijk there is since november 2003 :P
You read Kijk too? Awesome.

I don't remember when it was. It was somewhere around 8 years ago; but I'm pretty sure it was at least after they redid the format back in late 2003. It could be that you missed it since it was an article of only one page in length and largely filled with pictures. I even have Kijk's from back to '92; the impressions of the JSF back then were interesting. So were the hilarious ideas of hydrofoil destroyers. 8-)

Never seen the concept that Miko posted before, but I like that one too. I say this as an amateur but I think there's some good use of parking space, and good thinking about the leftmost cat. The AWACS reminds me that the Queen Liz doesn't have those...

PS: Just saw the P.1216's ass. Looks almost as if it has three engines. But I guess those are the vectoring nozzles.

_________________
You can call me Andy.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 19th, 2012, 3:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
yep, I read it too :P I even have ones from before 1992, got them from my old school..... IIRC it goes back to 1981 or even further... think about it, articles about the russians latest aircraft and all haha
I am at my mom next weekend most likely.... I have my archive there..... but it might just be after the restyle and before I became an member.

for that P1216: indeed, those are the nozzles. the P 1216 used the pegasus engine of the harrier with an different back, (IIRC even an afterburner could be installed, making this aircraft supersonic)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: March 19th, 2012, 3:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
yep, I read it too :P I even have ones from before 1992, got them from my old school..... IIRC it goes back to 1981 or even further... think about it, articles about the russians latest aircraft and all haha
I am at my mom next weekend most likely.... I have my archive there..... but it might just be after the restyle and before I became an member.

for that P1216: indeed, those are the nozzles. the P 1216 used the pegasus engine of the harrier with an different back, (IIRC even an afterburner could be installed, making this aircraft supersonic)
Eh, no. It used a new engine, and there was NO afterburner. Instead the cold air from the front fan could be burned (technically, Plenum Chamber Burning), which meant that it was the SIDE exhausts which would provide extra boost.
Also, the design was thought to be supercruising, e.g., would have been supersonic without PCB.

It really is a shame it was cancelled, because it would have given JSF performance at least a decade earlier. Well, with only marginal stealth.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 54 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 152 53 54 55 56123 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]