Shipbucket

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767

We actually have SLQ-32(v)1 & (v)2 lying around.
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=20&start=80

Hawkeye, some interesting drawings, but we've got the SLQ-32s covered:



I do need to draw the I-Band update, and I really think I'm going to pull your other images for the Misc. USN Electronics sheet that I'm going to make soon.

Edit: If you've got some sources you can direct me to for size, I am open to evaluating your components for replacing the ones we have now.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

I'm pretty sure this man is not twelve feet tall.

An effort should be made to confirm that new parts are actually better than the old ones before suggesting their use.

@ TimothyC & erik_t:

My source is the book "Kampfsysteme der US Navy" ("Battlesystems of the US Navy")
by Stefan Terzibaschitsch, Page 197, 198, 199, 200 and 228 for AN/SLQ-32
and Page 227, 229 and 230 for the other devices.
I try to scan the pics without to destroy my book.

-Michael-

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767

The 8"/55 Mk.12/15 is on the WWII sheet that I made.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16140164/Drawin ... Sheet1.png

If you mean the 6"/47RF/DP from the Worcester, here it is:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16140164/Drawin ... /647DP.png

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)

1st revision:





Pics:

















Links:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship ... slq-32.htm

http://books.google.de/books?id=4S3h8j_ ... 32&f=false

I cannot find a pic of the AS-3316 Antenna in the net. I try to get a handscanner for the pic in my book.

-Michael-

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767

Other devices:

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767

hawkeye, my 2 cents: I actually like the original SLQ-32 better. why? first of all the size of the original one is max 1 pixel off. that is proven by several ships I have worked on that have the system. only the foot might be a little short, but this is something easy to fix if needed for a ship.
second, because it is just completely fixed about 2 months ago. parts are replaced most of the time because there is better intel on their size available, or there are mistakes around, or the part is just really of the old days of the bucket and needs updating. none of these apply to the SLQ-32 currently.

and last but not least, because yours doesn't look like it. as main point: you cannot see that the sides are offset from the middle on yours, because the curve is not shown, only the 'arrays'.

also an question: what is that mast you drew on the previous page? it looks a lot like you have renewed systems that were all recently renewed or have drawings of them on ships already(for example the IFF, which is on the new Kongo and I believe, in an slightly different view, on the latest DDG-51 drawing) , and the mast doesn't seem to represent any kind of ship....

also, for the future, I advice (as I am not an mod on this thread, the only thread I can really ask you to do or not to do things is on the Dutch parts sheets) to ask TimothyC and/or Erik_T what systems need to be drawn. I am certain there will be enough to do, instead of redoing work that doesn't need redoing. I am not saying that all you have done here is bad work, neither am I saying that it is all useless, but well...... just my opinion

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Too many people on this forum spend too much time pooh-poohing minor parts inconsistencies instead of drawing ships.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)