Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 9  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 59 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 7th, 2013, 8:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
ah, makes sense, although I have doubts about them being on different heights..... but it could be build then.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 7th, 2013, 8:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'd loose all the 5"/54s on the long hull Arizona. Between the main guns and the six inchers you should have more NGS firepower than you'd ever need and each 5in gun takes at least thirty crew so you can cut manpower requirements by 360 just from the gun crews and it'll likely go well above 400 when you include director crews and such.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 9th, 2013, 7:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
so that's my try for the long hull version with only 22-inch and 8-inch guns retained; i've lowered the aft superstructure, the VLS and the harpoon launchers, removed all the Mark 37/25 directors and the SPQ9 (as they would be useless without the 5-inch guns), lowered the mainmast, lowered the stack, rearrenged the chaff launchers and the RAM, redone part of the bridge and rebuilt almost entirely the fore fire control tower trying to archieve a more USN-esque look; this way the forward SPY-1 arrays are placed 4 meters lower than before, and all the useless extra greenhouses are gone.
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 9th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
You should find a way to place those SPY panels together on your main mast, because they're actually fed by a signal generator deeper in the ship. On a Tico, there's two generators for two sets of panels, on a Burke there's one set for four panels. Unless the aft placement is actually two panels, and the fore one too (mirroring the Tico setup) you've got a rather unique setup where one signal generator is feeding three panels, and the other one one panel.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 9th, 2013, 9:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Yes, the SPY-1 setup is the same as the Ticonderoga cruisers, i also tought initially to place the arrays togheter like on the Arleigh Burke destroyers but eventually i've chosen to let those ships live with this flaw as the idea is have them as older battleships refitted this way instead of beign built from the ground-up (and i am indeed thinking about an AEGIS battleship designed from the ground-up to house the SPY-1 arrays, i've done just her hull tough)

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 10th, 2013, 12:13 am
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
Very nice! One small nitpick i got from the BBGN-029 I did, with a ship this size, the propeller blades may need to be a little fatter in order to maximize the water grab. I especially like your secondaries.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
t72ural
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: February 13th, 2013, 5:21 am
Offline
Posts: 12
Joined: January 15th, 2013, 4:18 am
Location: Rochester, NY
Looks alot like an American attempt to build a counterweight to the Kirov-class (or perhaps their successors). Great job! I can't wait to see how this turns out! :D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: April 5th, 2013, 5:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
ok, it's not a battleship, it's not a redux, but it's oversized and silly, more like a pixel-art attempt than a real viable design.. but i'm having fun.
[ img ]

(i must definitely kick myself in the head and get back to IJN warships...)

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: April 5th, 2013, 5:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
no, go on, have fun! it looks great, but keep the power requirements in mind: you might have to add another set of turbines (and for shafts this long, integrated electric drive would not be an bad idea :P)
I have some doubts about an twin gun fitting in that unit, though :P and I also doubt the forward 2 VLS cells would be different in position, for construction reasons, unless you can show me an real world ship with an arrangement like that? (note, for 2 blocks a bit apart from each other it makes sense, but as close as this I doubt it)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Oversized Battleships Redux.Posted: April 5th, 2013, 5:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 3907
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Looks good thus far!

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 9  [ 81 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 59 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]