Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 7  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
Author Message
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 5:07 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Minor revisions and updates. Also, top views are not pleasant.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 8:14 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
such a ship would of led to world war III but it would of been glorious.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 9:54 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Top views are fine if you're only doing them to show placement of stuff etcetera, one as detailed as this though... Yeah. Still It looks aweosme :]

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 10:41 am
Offline
Posts: 7232
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
I must admit this ship is growing on me more and more...

The top-view is excellent.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MC Spoilt B'stard
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 11:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao
Great ship i realy like it , only weird thing i think are these goalkeepers on a US ship,but great to see a top class ciws in US service. only one question : why you make this ship a cruiser? i would class it more as a battlecruiser or even battle ship.

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 12:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
MC Spoilt B'stard wrote:
Great ship i realy like it , only weird thing i think are these goalkeepers on a US ship,but great to see a top class ciws in US service. only one question : why you make this ship a cruiser? i would class it more as a battlecruiser or even battle ship.
That gets into the nature of what is a battleship and what is a battlecruiser. I tend to use the battleship definition of "A large ship with a main gun armament, and the armor to resist her own guns inside the majority of her own guns' range." Battlecruisers tend to be ships similar to battleships, but slightly smaller and with armor exchanged for speed. Just a reminder - the last battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class.
Philbob wrote:
such a ship would of led to world war III but it would of been glorious.
Why would a ship with less range and striking power than a carrier lead to World War 3?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 7:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
TimothyC wrote:
the last battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class.
Correction: the only battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class. We never actually got around to commissioning any proper battlecruisers ever.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 7:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Why is everyone using this really bad quality USN naval jack? IIRC, there's a perfectly acceptable one with stars properly aligned etc on the Alaska.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 8:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
klagldsf wrote:
TimothyC wrote:
the last battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class.
Correction: the only battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class. We never actually got around to commissioning any proper battlecruisers ever.
Alaska class is also battlecruisers right?

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Crazy huge CGN du jourPosted: January 3rd, 2011, 8:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
MitcheLL300 wrote:
klagldsf wrote:
Correction: the only battlecruiser the USN ordered was the Lexington class. We never actually got around to commissioning any proper battlecruisers ever.
Alaska class is also battlecruisers right?
Nope, Alaska, Guam, and the unfinished Hawaii were large cruisers, hence the CB designation, not a BC designation.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Last edited by TimothyC on January 6th, 2011, 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 7  [ 68 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]