Difference between revisions of "Westinghouse LWNP"

From Shipbucket Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Added *Alternate arrangements* section)
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Length !! Width !! Height  
 
! Length !! Width !! Height  
 +
|-
 +
| style="background: #fdcfd1;"| LM1600 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 25.5' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 10.1' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 11.3' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 539,706 lbs || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 20,000 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 27.0 lbs/HP
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="background: #d9ffd3;"| LM2500 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 26.5' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 10.5' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 11.75' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 602,500 lbs || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 25,000 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 24.1 lbs/HP
 
| style="background: #d9ffd3;"| LM2500 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 26.5' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 10.5' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 11.75' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 602,500 lbs || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 25,000 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 24.1 lbs/HP
 +
|-
 +
| style="background: #d9ffd3;"| FT4A|| style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 27.35' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 10.84' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 12.15' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 663,000 lbs || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 30,000 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 22.1 lbs/HP
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="background: #d9ffd3;"| LM5000 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 30.7' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 12.15' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 13.6' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 936,000 lbs || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 60,000 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 15.6 lbs/HP
 
| style="background: #d9ffd3;"| LM5000 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 30.7' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 12.15' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 13.6' || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 936,000 lbs || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 60,000 || style="background: #d9ffd3;"| 15.6 lbs/HP
Line 35: Line 39:
 
| style="background: #fdcfd1;"| LM5000 x 2 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 34.6' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 13.7' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 15.35' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 1,325,840 lbs || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 120,000 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 11.0 lbs/HP
 
| style="background: #fdcfd1;"| LM5000 x 2 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 34.6' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 13.7' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 15.35' || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 1,325,840 lbs || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 120,000 || style="background: #fdcfd1;"| 11.0 lbs/HP
 
|}
 
|}
<small>Green represents known data; red represents estimations. LM5000 x 2 unit is imaginary; no such plans exist.</small>
+
<small>Green represents known data; red represents estimations. LM1600 and LM5000 x 2 units are imaginary; no such plans exist.</small>
  
 
=== Extrapolation method ===
 
=== Extrapolation method ===
Line 41: Line 45:
  
 
Known volume of 25kSHP unit given as:<br>
 
Known volume of 25kSHP unit given as:<br>
<code><nowiki>L * W * H = V</nowiki></code><br>
+
{{math|size=150%|''l'' ⋅ ''w'' ⋅ ''h'' {{=}} ''v''}}<br>
 
Where density is constant in scaling up the system, volume is proportional to mass:<br>
 
Where density is constant in scaling up the system, volume is proportional to mass:<br>
<code><nowiki>V M</nowiki></code><br>
+
{{math|size=150%|''v'' ''m''}}<br>
 
A cube of the same volume has sides equal to:<br>
 
A cube of the same volume has sides equal to:<br>
<code><nowiki>V^(1/3)</nowiki></code><br>
+
{{math|size=150%|{{radic|''v''|3}}}}<br>
Ratio of side lengths given as, where K is equal to a known dimension (L, W, or H):<br>
+
Ratio of side lengths given as, where {{math|''k''}} is equal to a known dimension ({{math|''l''}}, {{math|''w''}}, or {{math|''h''}}) and {{math|''v''{{sub|n}}}} is the new volume:<br>
<code><nowiki>V^(1/3) / (V^(1/3) / K)</nowiki></code><br>
+
{{math|size=150%|{{pars|''l''{{sub|n}}}} or {{pars|''w''{{sub|n}}}} or {{pars|''h''{{sub|n}}}} {{=}} {{sfrac|{{radic|''v''{{sub|n}}|3}}|{{pars|{{sfrac|{{radic|''v''|3}}|''k''}}}}}} {{=}} {{sfrac|''k'' ⋅ {{radic|''v''{{sub|n}}|3}}|{{radic|''v''|3}}}}}}<br>
New dimensions given as L1, W1, and H1 give new volume:<br>
+
New dimensions given as {{math|''l''{{sub|n}}}}, {{math|''w''{{sub|n}}}}, and {{math|''h''{{sub|n}}}} give new volume:<br>
<code><nowiki>L1 * W1 * H1 = V1</nowiki></code>
+
{{math|size=150%|''l''{{sub|n}} ⋅ ''w''{{sub|n}} ⋅ ''h''{{sub|n}} {{=}} ''v''{{sub|n}}}}
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Latest revision as of 22:37, 18 March 2021

Westinghouse LWNP.png

History

The Westinghouse Light Weight Nuclear Propulsion(LWNP) was an propulsion plant designed to be an drop-in replacement for either the LM2500 or FT4 Gas turbines in marine powerplants. It was based on existing technologies, notably those developed for nuclear rocket reactors. The LWNP consisted of an gas cooled nuclear reactor and an integrally packed gas turbine. In the paper describing this powerplant a few ship installations are proposed, none were ever build.

Used on

Affiliated systems

Part description

There are 2 setups drawin in the part image. The setup on the left has a full setup with an foot and gearbox such as would be found when installed on a ship. On the right is just the LWNP drawn. Both have a sideview (bottom) and top view (top). For placements in warships double units are shown in the source image, 1 on 1 replacing the double LM2500 units as found on for example Spruance class ships. In that installation the shielding overlaps (no need for shielding between the powerplants) in which case the shafts are 10' apart.

Alternate arrangements

Other speculative estimates for other possible arrangements.
Approximation of the LM5000 equivalent LWNP shown above the LM2500 equivalent with its known dimensions.

While not specified in detail, the LWNP proposal also included provisions and rudimentary data for a 60,000 SHP variant. This proposed variant approximates an LM5000 engine module's footprint while providing the same benefits and disadvantages as the smaller LWNP unit. Although no data on dimensions are present in the proposal, a claimed specific power of approximately 15.6 lb/HP allows for an estimation of the larger LWNP footprint. Please note that the following data is speculative unless specified.

Single LWNP unit data
Equivalent Dimensions Weight SHP Specific power
Length Width Height
LM1600 25.5' 10.1' 11.3' 539,706 lbs 20,000 27.0 lbs/HP
LM2500 26.5' 10.5' 11.75' 602,500 lbs 25,000 24.1 lbs/HP
FT4A 27.35' 10.84' 12.15' 663,000 lbs 30,000 22.1 lbs/HP
LM5000 30.7' 12.15' 13.6' 936,000 lbs 60,000 15.6 lbs/HP
LM5000 x 2 34.6' 13.7' 15.35' 1,325,840 lbs 120,000 11.0 lbs/HP

Green represents known data; red represents estimations. LM1600 and LM5000 x 2 units are imaginary; no such plans exist.

Extrapolation method

While estimating the dimensions for the LM5000 equivalent unit, it is assumed that the density of the unit remains identical, representing a pure scaleup of the LM2500 equivalent unit. In practice, this may not have been the case; however, it is assumed to be a perfect scale of the smaller unit due to the limited information.

Known volume of 25kSHP unit given as:
lwh = v
Where density is constant in scaling up the system, volume is proportional to mass:
vm
A cube of the same volume has sides equal to:
3v
Ratio of side lengths given as, where k is equal to a known dimension (l, w, or h) and vn is the new volume:
(ln) or (wn) or (hn) = 3vn/(3v/k) = k3vn/3v
New dimensions given as ln, wn, and hn give new volume:
lnwnhn = vn

See also